Re: Big bang Theory VS Creationism

	Duration: 07:55 minutes Upload Time: 07-08-01 16:50:15 User: g0at :::: Favorites
Description: Video Cam Direct Upload
Comments
annadianes1exymomdi ::: Favorites Find a hot date at >>>> FLINGDATINGSITE dot COM <<<< 07-08-27 05:06:25 _____________________________________________________
ivarbt ::: Favorites good video 07-08-03 20:04:24 _____________________________________________________
stikefreedom ::: Favorites very well said! 07-08-03 01:55:26 _____________________________________________________
Boanerges7 ::: Favorites I'm confused as to what exactly your position is regarding what you're talking about. Are you saying that you are taking this position of humility? Humility is revealed,outside of one's own opinion,and not self applicable. Regarding the comment you make regarding thermodynamics, is it safe to say you believe e.g. that the ozone will regenerate itself in a billion years? No evidence that's true at all. Im thinking you made a video applauding a neutral position... 07-08-02 22:38:49 _____________________________________________________
g0at ::: Favorites Thermodynamics applys the the universe as a WHOLE. I do not believe that our ozone will regenerate to a " certain point" basec on the laws of thermodynamics. 07-08-03 01:58:41 _____________________________________________________
Boanerges7 ::: Favorites I'd like to hear your theory on how that will come about, with something evidentary outside of a hypothesis. Is it some sort of evolutionary process that you can show evidence that this is a fact? Or is it something that will take hundreds of billions of years that you will never see the evidence of, like thermodynamics... 07-08-08 10:41:52 _____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
mejc2 ::: Favorites You are a good guy. I don't usually lay things out like this but you seem like a good kid so I will help you out. This might be a little long but here goes. 07-08-11 18:06:36 _____________________________________________________
mejc2 ::: Favorites first you seem to think that creationist looked around and couldn't figure things out so they invented god. that isn't what is going on here. the bible is a compilation of 66 books with 40 authors written over a period of 1500 years and each author didn't always know what was written before him. but there is one message. that in itself is impossible. 07-08-11 18:08:56 _____________________________________________________
mejc2 ::: Favorites Noah and Adam lived at the same time, so when God told Noah to build a boat there was no question of who is this God or a mysterious being Adam and his children were still alive and could very well give eye witness accounts to Noah about God. 07-08-11 18:11:05 _____________________________________________________
mejc2 ::: Favorites Moses who wrote down the account of creation and the Flood was alive at the same time as Noah. The Flood account wasn't a myth to him. People that were on the ark were alive and the people alive at the time were there descendants. This wasn't whisper down the lane. 07-08-11 18:13:12 _____________________________________________________
mejc2 ::: Favorites So The Bible isn't an atempt to explain the mysteries of the universe. these guys were just telling how things were and what they saw. 07-08-11 20:05:42 _____________________________________________________
jbduke51 ::: Favorites Moses didnt write the account of the flood..it was written years and years after the suppossed event took place. 07-08-13 00:39:34 _____________________________________________________
mejc2 ::: Favorites Moses did write the account and Moses lived years after the flood. 07-08-13 15:47:47 _____________________________________________________
jbduke51 ::: Favorites We only have old tradition that moses wrote the torah. But with scholar research we can see that atleast 4 people wrote the torah.That is going by research rather than unreliable tradition. 07-08-13 19:39:00 _____________________________________________________
mejc2 ::: Favorites you accept suppositions of people 6,000 years after the fact over the document's claims and the acceptance of the people that handed down the document.Yikes! 07-08-13 22:37:38 _____________________________________________________
jbduke51 ::: Favorites moses was not named after the author until many years after they were written.The writting styles are too different to be written by one person. 07-08-14 00:20:52 _____________________________________________________
mejc2 ::: Favorites speculation about writing styles from 6000 years ago in a language that isn't spoken today is not exactly what anyone would call hard evidence. Archaeological finds support the ancient writings.if they were bogus the oposite would be true. 07-08-14 04:29:19 _____________________________________________________
jbduke51 ::: Favorites I am not refering to the text as being "bogus".I just mean when a text is anonymous than you are going on oral tradition which in the end doesnt mean much. 07-08-14 17:30:08 _____________________________________________________
mejc2 ::: Favorites 66 books written by 0ver 40 authors. not all writers knew what was written before they wrote. authors ranged in status from kings to paupers. and they contain one message. you can't get 10 people that witness the same event to agree. this book is in no way a compilation of oral tradition. 07-08-14 21:27:23 _____________________________________________________
jbduke51 ::: Favorites i was talking about the torah..i think you misunderstood me. 07-08-15 00:47:40 _____________________________________________________